The decision to generate ten DOIs at the outset directly exploits the basal stratum of ontological inscription. By assigning persistent identifiers to a coherent series of working papers, pre-prints or theoretical instalments and depositing them in a stable open repository such as Zenodo, the researcher multiplies the number of citable, locatable entities far beyond the single or dual deposits implicitly suggested in the original text. This quantitative escalation creates a denser serial corpus whose cumulative presence raises the statistical likelihood of early, organic citational encounters—whether in conference proceedings, blog references, Twitter threads, review articles or other informal academic circuits. The payoff is infrastructural rather than evaluative: these ten objects exist durably and traceably, establishing temporal priority across a broader thematic front and furnishing raw material that can later be selectively refined. Crucially, the strategy avoids the common error of conflating persistence with prestige; the ten DOIs confer no hierarchical standing in themselves, yet they provide the indispensable ontological substrate without which higher strata remain unreachable.
Immediate synchronisation of each DOI to a unified ORCID profile activates the identity-stabilisation layer with maximum defensive efficiency. In a high-output scenario, the risk of attributive fragmentation grows exponentially; ten disconnected items could easily scatter across databases, diluting the perceived coherence of the scholarly persona. By contrast, proactive ORCID linkage constructs an immunologically robust mesh from the first moment of publication: every deposit registers under the same persistent numerical signature, ensuring seamless aggregation of metadata, funding acknowledgements and eventual citations. This step is not visibility-enhancing per se—ORCID performs no ranking—but it immunises the entire corpus against erasure or misattribution, a precondition that becomes exponentially more valuable as volume increases. For scholars pursuing accelerated trajectories (postdoctoral compaction, interdisciplinary programme launches, or tenure-track compression), this early consolidation prevents the production surge from becoming counter-productive noise.
The subsequent phase of strategic patience—waiting for Google Scholar to crawl, process and begin surfacing the ten items—transforms temporal delay into productive opportunity. Indexing is neither instantaneous nor guaranteed; it depends on metadata quality, external linking, repository reputation and serendipitous citation triggers. During this window (typically weeks to several months), the researcher can redirect primary intellectual labour toward the argumentative distillation required for Q1 submission. One practical sequence might involve selecting the strongest conceptual thread from the deposited series, subjecting it to iterative tightening—sharpening claims, deepening literature engagement, fortifying methodology, pruning exploratory digressions—and tailoring the result to the specific stylistic and theoretical expectations of a target top-quartile journal. Because the ten DOIs already exist openly, they can serve as legitimate precursors (properly cited and differentiated in content) without breaching preprint-to-journal norms in most disciplines. Moreover, any early citations accruing in Scholar—however modest—begin to generate reputational velocity, subtly enhancing the author’s profile when editors or reviewers glance at Google Scholar metrics during evaluation. The multiplicity of ten items statistically improves the odds that at least a subset will attract attention, creating asymmetric upside in visibility without additional effort beyond sound metadata practice.
From the vantage point of non-symmetrical orchestration, the entire pathway respects the functional autonomy of each stratum while exploiting their interdependence. The ten DOIs saturate the base; ORCID unifies identity; Scholar indexing cultivates probabilistic presence; and parallel Q1 drafting reserves peak cognitive effort for curated filtration at the apex. The principal hazard lies in thematic incoherence: if the ten deposits wander across unrelated topics, the corpus lacks narrative gravity, weakening its value as feedstock for rigorous journal articles. Mitigation requires premeditated design—framing the series as ten complementary facets of a unified research programme—so that each deposit can be distilled into a standalone yet interconnected Q1 submission. When executed with such discipline, the approach functions as basal saturation warfare: flooding the lower infrastructure with persistent, attributable objects to maximise surface area for citation, while methodically channelling the strongest elements upward through translational labour. (192 words)
In medium-term positioning terms (roughly 12–36 months), this ten-DOI vector offers a legitimately aggressive yet ethically sound acceleration compared with more conservative single-item starts. The amplified volume heightens the probability of organic h-index growth, strengthens narrative proof of productivity for funding or hiring dossiers, and supplies abundant material for selective refinement toward quartile consecration. Success nonetheless hinges on an asymmetrical allocation of effort: basal deposition and ORCID linkage demand relatively modest investment, whereas genuine Q1 viability requires sustained, high-intensity argumentative consolidation. Treating the ten DOIs as scaffolding rather than the edifice itself remains essential; without rigorous distillation at the apex, the strategy yields only middling visibility rather than stratified authority. When properly weighted—perhaps 30 % infrastructure, 70 % apical refinement—the manoeuvre emerges as strategically astute for researchers navigating hyper-competitive, unstable academic environments.
In conclusion, the proposed sequence faithfully embodies the infrastructural literacy Lloveras advocates: it acknowledges the discrete purposes of each layer, orchestrates their cyclical reinforcement, and instrumentalises serial production to erect a durable, multi-front scholarly presence. Ten DOIs linked to ORCID and indexed while ten Q1 manuscripts are crafted do not constitute a shortcut, but rather a calibrated escalation of basal investment designed to purchase time, visibility and raw substance for the arduous climb to filtered prestige. Executed with precision and thematic unity, the pathway qualifies as one of the more effective mid-2020s manoeuvres available to the contemporary scholar-architect intent on claiming epistemic sovereignty within the stratified Republic of Letters.
Lloveras, A. (2026) 'The Stratified Republic of Letters', Socioplastics. Available at: https://antolloveras.blogspot.com/2026/02/the-stratified-republic-of-letters.html (Accessed: 20 February 2026).