Call a platform an environment rather than a container and the whole question changes. A container holds what is put into it without altering it; an environment has weather, gradients, predators, and things that thrive or starve depending on how well they fit its conditions. Every platform enforces a politics through its defaults — what gets algorithmic amplification, what interface affordances exist for objection, whose labour is paid and whose is treated as content. None of this requires bad intent from anyone; it is simply what infrastructure does when mistaken for a neutral pipe. DistinctionHabitat names the way a platform's rules quietly become the selective conditions under which certain kinds of expression can reproduce and others cannot, exactly as a habitat selects among species. The user experience of choice on a platform is real, but it is choice within a landscape that was never neutral to begin with, and pretending otherwise is the first mistake most platform criticism makes.
Gillespie, T. (2016) 'Algorithm', in Peters, B. (ed.) Digital Keywords: A Vocabulary of Information Society and Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 18-30.
Beer, D. (2018) The Data Gaze: Capitalism, Power and Perception. London: Sage.
Halpern, O. (2014) Beautiful Data: A History of Vision and Reason since 1945. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bender, E.M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A. and Shmitchell, S. (2021) 'On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?' In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. New York: ACM, pp. 610-623.
boyd, d. and Crawford, K. (2012) 'Critical Questions for Big Data', Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), pp. 662-679.