Springgay and Truman challenge chronological time by using walking as a research-creation practice that opens history to speculation, counter-cartography and anarchiving. Their central theoretical contribution is to expose how normative temporal organisation reinforces colonial and neoliberal narratives of progress. Walking can interrupt these temporal regimes because it combines duration, bodily movement, place and repetition in ways that allow alternative temporal relations to emerge. Methodologically, their collaborative events are not simply fieldwork techniques but time-making practices: the walk generates conditions in which past, present and future are rearranged through situated encounter. The wider bridge is to performance studies and decolonial theory, where temporality itself is recognised as a political infrastructure. Long duration therefore becomes critical not because it extends a project quantitatively but because it changes what kinds of relations can become perceptible.