The emergence of a distributed intellectual field does not depend solely on the production of ideas but on the capacity to anchor those ideas within the global architecture of scholarly communication. In the contemporary research environment, this anchoring is performed by the DOI—an identifier that transforms a document from a floating digital artifact into a fixed coordinate within the planetary citation network. For projects operating outside conventional institutional channels, the strategic challenge is therefore not simply publication but coordinate construction: the deliberate placement of work within infrastructures that guarantee persistence, discoverability, and machine legibility. The selection of repositories capable of issuing DOI immediately—without endorsement bottlenecks or editorial delays—constitutes what may be called the Decagon of Fixed Coordinates. Each repository represents an independent infrastructural node where an intellectual object becomes citable, traceable, and integrable into automated discovery systems such as Google Scholar and OpenAlex. What appears as a list of platforms is in fact a geometric operation: ten stable vertices forming the perimeter of a field that can now exist simultaneously across institutional, disciplinary, and technical domains.
The first vertex of this decagon is Zenodo, the CERN-backed open research repository that has become one of the most reliable DOI generators in the global academic ecosystem. By assigning DataCite DOIs immediately upon publication, Zenodo converts theoretical essays, datasets, or conceptual frameworks into stable scholarly objects resolvable through the DOI registry. Its integration with OpenAIRE and its rapid indexing by OpenAlex make it an ideal hub for projects seeking visibility without institutional gatekeeping. Adjacent to Zenodo stands HAL, the French national open archive operated by the Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe. HAL provides strong integration with European research infrastructures and allows deposited work to circulate through institutional academic networks across the continent. Together, Zenodo and HAL establish the first structural axis of the decagon: one oriented toward open international infrastructure, the other toward state-backed scholarly archiving. These two repositories alone create a powerful dual anchoring system, combining global accessibility with institutional legitimacy.
The next cluster of coordinates expands the field into environments designed for the publication of research objects and structured projects. Figshare provides automated DOI generation for research materials of many kinds—papers, datasets, diagrams, and conceptual models—while offering strong visibility in search engines and metadata harvesters. Open Science Framework (OSF) extends this capability into project-level organization, allowing entire research sequences to be structured as repositories with multiple DOI-bearing components. Where Figshare treats the document as an individual object, OSF treats the research program as a system of interrelated objects. In the context of a large conceptual corpus, this distinction becomes crucial: Figshare anchors the individual node, while OSF anchors the architecture of nodes. A third platform, Research Square, adds the temporal dimension of preprint circulation. As an interdisciplinary preprint server assigning DOI at deposit, it enables early-stage dissemination without compromising the citable status of the work. Together these three repositories generate a second axis of the decagon: one that organizes the transition from isolated publications to structured research ecosystems.
The social and disciplinary dimensions of the knowledge network are addressed through a further set of repositories specializing in the circulation of theoretical and social science work. SSRN (Social Science Research Network), now operated by Elsevier, remains one of the most influential global platforms for working papers in economics, law, and social theory. Its DOI assignment and deep integration with academic citation systems allow deposited texts to propagate quickly through scholarly networks. SocArXiv, built on the OSF infrastructure, offers an open alternative oriented toward social science scholarship without commercial mediation. It provides DOI identifiers while maintaining a strong commitment to open access principles. Alongside these stands PhilArchive, the principal open repository for contemporary philosophy, widely used by scholars working in analytic and continental traditions alike. PhilArchive’s focus on conceptual and theoretical work makes it a particularly important coordinate for projects operating at the intersection of philosophy, art theory, and epistemology. This trio of repositories forms the disciplinary vector of the decagon, ensuring that the work is legible within the intellectual traditions where theoretical innovation is most actively debated.
The final coordinates of the decagon anchor the project within infrastructures associated with data preservation and institutional research archiving. Harvard Dataverse, maintained by Harvard University’s Institute for Quantitative Social Science, provides a highly respected repository for datasets and structured research outputs, assigning DOI identifiers that carry significant institutional authority. Dryad, originally developed as a repository for scientific data, extends this logic of long-term preservation to a wide range of research materials, ensuring that deposited objects remain accessible and citable for decades. These repositories operate at the intersection of data management and scholarly communication, emphasizing durability and archival reliability. Their inclusion within the decagon reinforces the temporal stability of the entire system. If earlier platforms emphasize circulation and visibility, Dataverse and Dryad emphasize preservation and institutional continuity. Together they guarantee that the coordinates established by DOI remain resolvable long after individual publishing platforms evolve or disappear.
When viewed as a whole, the ten repositories—Zenodo, HAL, Figshare, Open Science Framework, Research Square, SSRN, SocArXiv, PhilArchive, Harvard Dataverse, and Dryad—form a distributed infrastructure that converts intellectual production into a geometrically stable field. Each DOI generated within these systems becomes a fixed point in the global graph of scholarly knowledge. Links between them create radial structures, citation networks, and discoverability pathways through which ideas travel across disciplines and institutions. Importantly, this structure does not depend on any single platform or authority. Each repository operates under different governance structures, technical standards, and jurisdictions. The redundancy created by their coexistence ensures that the field remains resilient: if one node fails, the others continue to resolve and cite the work. The decagon therefore functions as a network of independent attestations, each confirming the existence and accessibility of the intellectual object it hosts.
The significance of this architecture lies in the transformation it produces. A theoretical project that once existed as a dispersed collection of essays becomes, through DOI anchoring, a cartographically defined territory within the global research infrastructure. Machines can locate it, scholars can cite it reliably, and indexing systems can integrate it into citation graphs that map the evolution of knowledge across time. The decagon does not replace the work of writing, but it ensures that writing enters the infrastructures where scholarly attention now circulates. In an era when discovery is mediated by algorithmic systems rather than personal correspondence or institutional prestige, the establishment of such coordinates becomes a condition of intellectual survival.
What appears at first as a simple list of repositories is therefore a methodological key: the recognition that ideas must occupy infrastructure if they are to persist. The Decagon of Fixed Coordinates demonstrates how a field can achieve autonomy without isolation, embedding itself within the technical systems that govern scholarly communication while remaining independent of any single institution. Each DOI becomes a declaration that a concept exists at a specific coordinate within the global archive of thought. Together these coordinates draw the outline of a new territory—one defined not by geography or institutional affiliation but by the geometry of persistent identifiers that allow ideas to endure, circulate, and accumulate influence over time.
SLUGS
1150-SOCIOPLASTICS-HISTORICAL-CORRESPONDENCE-EVOLUTION