From 2000 onward, Lloveras described architecture and urbanism as art while directing and partnering in more than one hundred built, designed and staged projects. Thousands of hours of office design work and the experience of constructing many of those ideas gave the later research corpus a practical substrate: concepts repeatedly return to material constraints, implementation and use. A tombola begins with separate pieces whose relation has not yet been decided. Socioplastics has always contained something of that condition. Individual posts arrive from different projects, places, images, readings and accidents. Their order is partly deliberate and partly contingent. At eleven thousand nodes, however, contingency no longer means absence of structure. Repetition begins to reveal patterns that could not have been planned in advance. This is one reason the numbering matters. Every fragment keeps the memory of its arrival even after it becomes part of a Tome, a Book, a marker system or a later thematic sequence. The corpus can therefore be reorganised without pretending that its new order was always there. Historical sequence and retrospective interpretation coexist. Chance remains productive inside such a system. An old node can suddenly become relevant to a new project; two distant entries can form a pair; a marker coined for one problem can illuminate another. The larger the corpus becomes, the more possible these encounters are. Scale increases not only storage but combinatorial potential. The apparent randomness also demands a discipline of provenance. Subir Bajando (2026) argues that a growing corpus must distinguish recurrence from duplication and record the transformations of each object. Relational Longitudinality (2026) shows how a chance encounter may become analytically relevant years later through subsequent traces. El Tómbolo works in that interval between contingency and retrospective pattern: combinations may be unexpected, but the archive must never pretend they were planned from the start. Chance creates openings; indexing makes it possible to assess what those openings actually produced. El Tómbolo reads 11K as the moment when thousands of contingent arrivals begin to behave like a machine for producing connections. The index below keeps the draw visible: every number retains its place, while the field around it remains open to another combination. FULL PROJECT INDEX https://antolloveras.blogspot.com/p/socioplastics-project-index.html
Cheng, Y.-Y. and Xia, Y. (2023) ‘A Systematic Review of Methods for Aligning, Mapping, Merging Taxonomies in Information Sciences’, Journal of Documentation. Accepted manuscript. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2023-0003.
Cheng and Xia shift attention from building taxonomies to the harder problem of making different taxonomies interact. Reviewing 28 studies through a knowledge-organisation-systems perspective, they decompose alignment into input, approach and output, distinguishing characteristics such as tree form, variable naming, symmetry, matching unit, comparison type, relation type and whether original taxonomies survive the resulting solution. The methodological operation is interoperability audit. Alignment becomes not a binary technical success but a set of choices about what is preserved, merged, translated or discarded. This bridges information science, taxonomy engineering, metadata interoperability and knowledge organisation. The crucial insight for a critical lexicon is that reconciliation can destroy precisely the differences that made separate schemes meaningful. Crosswalks and mappings therefore need to record relation type and transformation history rather than silently collapse distinct vocabularies into one. Cheng and Xia make preservation itself an analytical variable. Their work supplies a contemporary technical analogue for the older philosophical problem of non-equivalence: interoperability can increase without requiring ontological fusion.
Tu, R., Xiao, Y., Huang, J., Zhou, J., Yin, S. and Song, S. (2026) ‘Health effects of exposure to different urban walking environments: A systematic review and meta-analysis’, Journal of Transport & Health, 47, 102246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2025.102246
Tu and colleagues isolate a question often blurred in active-travel research: whether the environment through which walking occurs produces effects beyond walking itself. Synthesising 55 intervention studies, the review compares natural and artificial urban walking settings across psychological and physiological outcomes. Natural environments significantly improve positive affect and reduce anxiety, while differences in heart rate, blood pressure, cortisol, mood and cognitive performance are not consistently significant. Distance and duration matter, and the review identifies thermal comfort and adequate walking space as underintegrated environmental conditions. The methodological importance lies in separating movement as physical activity from environmental exposure as a concurrent causal field. This creates a bridge between transport research and environmental psychology: walking is simultaneously mobility, exercise and situated exposure. The urban implication is that pedestrian infrastructure cannot be evaluated by connectivity or step counts alone; the qualitative conditions encountered along the route participate in what walking does to the body and mind.
Pujal i Llombart, M. and Cubells Serra, J. (2019) La identidad (el self). Barcelona: Fundació Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.
Pujal and Cubells dismantle the idea of identity as a stable interior essence by reconstructing the self across biological, psychoanalytic, phenomenological, interactionist, constructionist, queer and intersectional approaches. Their strongest contribution is to show that identity is simultaneously experienced as personal and produced through social categories, institutional vocabularies and relations of recognition. Agency and narrative do not disappear in this account; they become situated operations through which people compose a provisional continuity from heterogeneous positions. Methodologically, the text works comparatively, placing different explanatory models beside one another and making their assumptions visible. The later sections on categorisation, prejudice, gender and intersectionality demonstrate that social identities are not merely descriptive labels but organise access, vulnerability and legitimacy. The module therefore bridges social psychology with feminist theory, symbolic interactionism and critical studies of classification. Its central operation is to shift the question from “what is the true self?” to “through which practices, categories and relations does a self become intelligible?”
Fjellstad, W., Eiter, S., Puschmann, O. and Krøgli, S.O. (2022) ‘Planning the First View: Establishing a Landscape Monitoring Scheme Based on Photography’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 226, 104470. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104470.
Fjellstad and colleagues turn photography into a systematic longitudinal instrument by asking how the first photograph should be taken if it is intended to support future comparison. Their experiment contrasts predefined viewpoints and directions with freely selected photographic positions. Standardised locations provide more even territorial coverage, improve repeatability and reduce photographer dependence, whereas free selection captures rare, memorable and visually distinctive features that systematic sampling can miss. The paper’s strongest operation is therefore hybrid rather than purist: combine fixed points with discretionary photographs. This acknowledges that landscape monitoring must preserve both representativeness and surprise. The study also exposes photography as a selective practice: familiarity, professional background and route order influence what becomes visible. Its contribution bridges landscape monitoring, visual methods and environmental perception by converting the photograph from illustration into temporal evidence. A view becomes scientifically useful when its conditions of production are explicit enough to be revisited, compared and interpreted through change.
Pink, S. (2008) ‘An Urban Tour: The Sensory Sociality of Ethnographic Place-Making’, Ethnography, 9(2), pp. 175–196. doi:10.1177/1466138108089467.
Pink treats ethnographic place not as a pre-existing spatial object but as something constituted through embodied, sensory and social practice. Her urban-tour case makes walking, eating, drinking, imagining, photographing and audio-visual recording part of a shared process through which researcher and participants produce a place together. The iconic contribution is the concept of ethnographic place-making: knowledge does not arise from detached observation of an environment but from the researcher’s own emplacement within practices, rhythms and sensory encounters. Methodologically, this shifts the camera from documentary supplement to an element of participation and memory, while the walk becomes both spatial movement and analytical operation. The work bridges sensory ethnography, visual anthropology and mobile methods by showing that perception is relational and situated. Its wider significance lies in converting everyday movement into an epistemic condition: the field becomes intelligible through co-presence and attention rather than through distance alone.
Gómez-Mendoza, J. (2013) ‘Del patrimonio paisaje a los paisajes patrimonio’, Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 59(1), pp. 5–20.
Gómez-Mendoza historicises the relation between landscape and heritage in order to reverse a familiar hierarchy. Instead of asking which heritage objects possess landscape qualities, she argues for recognising landscapes themselves as heritage because their singularity condenses long interactions between natural and human processes. The distinction between political and vernacular landscapes is central: one materialises territorial order through planning and power, while the other accumulates through situated collective practices. Heritage therefore becomes less a property inherent in exceptional objects than a historically produced mode of valuation applied to territorial configurations. The methodological operation is genealogical, following how monument, cultural landscape and patrimonial landscape change meaning across institutions and periods, including UNESCO frameworks. Its wider bridge is to critical heritage studies: landscapes become archives of power, use and transmission whose value cannot be detached from the historical processes that made them visible, governable and worthy of preservation.
Şencan, R.S., Yılmaz, E., Lafit, G., Hoemann, K. and Mesquita, B. (2026) ‘From words to worlds: Cultural (mis)fit in the emotional contexts of Belgians and Turkish newcomers’, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 10, 100276. doi:10.1016/j.cresp.2026.100276.
Şencan and colleagues shift emotional acculturation from the question of whether people feel similarly to the question of whether they inhabit similar emotional situations. Interviews with Turkish newcomers in Belgium and Dutch-speaking Belgians were analysed through topic modelling, allowing recurrent contexts to emerge from natural-language accounts rather than being imposed in advance. The study distinguishes fit in context from fit in emotion and shows that each group aligns more closely with its own culture’s contextual pattern, even when emotional fit does not follow the same relation. Its strongest conceptual move is to treat context as constitutive rather than background: emotional worlds are patterned by obligations, logistics, communication, interdependence and culturally recurrent situations. Methodologically, qualitative interpretation and quantitative modelling are deliberately combined, producing a model of cultural fit that is multilayered rather than scalar. The paper bridges migration studies, cultural psychology and computational text analysis, replacing acculturation as simple convergence with a more ecological account of how people come to share—or fail to share—worlds.
Gonzalez, M.F. and Cohen-Charash, Y. (2026) ‘Loaded Language: Terminology Influences Everyday Beliefs About Emotions and People Expressing Them’, Affective Science. doi:10.1007/s42761-026-00367-8.
Gonzalez and Cohen-Charash show that the vocabulary used to classify emotions carries evaluative force. Across four studies involving 818 participants, the familiar labels “positive” and “negative” were found to be more value-laden than supposedly descriptive alternatives such as “pleasant” and “unpleasant”, affecting judgements not only of emotions but of the people expressing them. The paper’s iconic contribution is the Words-as-Values framework: terminology operates as a normative device that can make feelings and subjects appear desirable, undesirable, moral or problematic before any further interpretation takes place. Methodologically, the authors compare alternative terminological frames and trace their consequences across perception and evaluation rather than treating wording as a neutral experimental wrapper. The study connects affective science with framing theory, linguistic relativity and norm formation. Its importance exceeds terminological hygiene: it provides experimental evidence that ordinary psychological classifications participate in the realities they claim merely to describe, converting language into a subtle technology of emotional governance.
Chaouch-Orozco, A., Li, X. and Li, P. (2026) ‘Cultural attitudes towards the future shape the semantic structure of emotion concepts’, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13, 387. doi:10.1057/s41599-026-06623-3.
Chaouch-Orozco, Li and Li demonstrate that emotion concepts are organised differently across cultural-linguistic environments and identify temporal orientation as a specific predictor of that variation. Native speakers of fifteen languages arranged forty-seven emotion concepts according to perceived semantic similarity, producing language-specific semantic spaces. The methodological strength lies in turning conceptual organisation into a relational geometry rather than treating words as isolated lexical units. Pairwise comparison then makes cultural distance analytically visible: long-term orientation emerges as the strongest cultural predictor of semantic similarity, with geographical distance adding a more modest effect, while several other Hofstede dimensions contribute little once shared variance is controlled. The theoretical importance of the paper lies in moving beyond the vague proposition that “culture matters” toward a measurable account of how a particular cultural orientation shapes conceptual space. It bridges cultural psychology, lexical semantics and cognitive science by treating semantic organisation itself as evidence of culturally patterned emotional knowledge rather than as a neutral linguistic container.
Bae, S.Y. (2026) ‘What and How Emotions Represent: A Constructionist Predictive Processing Account’, Erkenntnis. doi:10.1007/s10670-026-01070-7.
Bae gives constructionism a neurocomputational mechanism without returning to fixed biological signatures. The paper preserves the claim that emotions represent relational properties—danger, loss, offence, goal progress—but rejects the idea that stable bodily patterns carry this content directly. Instead, emotional episodes are generated through domain-general predictive processing in which emotion concepts operate as hierarchical, context-sensitive priors integrating interoceptive, exteroceptive, mnemonic and normative information. The theoretical contribution is therefore twofold: concepts become constitutive rather than merely descriptive, while embodiment remains central without determining a one-to-one emotional taxonomy. Methodologically, Bae combines philosophical analysis of intentionality with predictive-processing models to explain how similar bodily states can become fear, excitement or calm under different contextual priors. The paper bridges philosophy of emotion, computational neuroscience and cultural constructionism by showing how conceptual learning and social history can enter the architecture of prediction itself. Variability becomes a property of the mechanism, not an anomaly added after the fact.
Eickers, G. and Prinz, J. (2026) ‘Social Construction of Emotions 3.0’, Journal of the American Philosophical Association, pp. 255–275. doi:10.1017/apa.2025.10022.
Eickers and Prinz update social constructionism by refusing the habitual split between cultural meaning and bodily response. Their central claim is that social norms do not merely label pre-existing affective states but materialise through embodiment, shaping whose bodies may display which emotions, in which situations, and with what consequences. The paper therefore shifts construction from an exclusively conceptual register toward a socio-corporeal account in which norms and physiology are mutually implicated. Methodologically, it is synthetic and reconstructive: transitory role theory and Conceptual Act Theory are assessed alongside work from sociology, anthropology and queer theory to identify what earlier constructionisms leave underdeveloped. The resulting model is especially important for debates on emotional injustice because it makes differential permission, recognition and legibility part of emotion theory itself. Its wider bridge is to feminist materialism and social ontology: the body appears neither as a natural substrate beneath culture nor as pure discourse, but as a historically patterned site where social force becomes affectively real.
A corpus becomes infrastructural when its multiplication of objects is accompanied by an equivalent multiplication of relations, addresses and operations. Ten thousand isolated documents remain ten thousand isolated documents; ten thousand persistently identified entities connected through typed metadata constitute a different epistemic object. The decisive threshold is therefore relational rather than numerical. Scale begins to matter when accumulation can be traversed, queried, recombined and verified. Identification supplies the first condition of this transformation. Juty et al. show that unique, persistent and resolvable identifiers establish addressability: an object can remain the same referent even when its location changes. Cousijn et al. extend this logic by demonstrating that persistence becomes substantially more valuable once PIDs are connected through metadata. The resulting graph converts naming into topology. A paper, dataset, person, institution or instrument no longer exists merely as a record; it occupies a position in a relational field whose connections can themselves become evidence.
Relational scale also changes what publication means. Haris, Stocker and Auer expose the limits of a scholarly system in which the PDF remains the dominant terminal object. Machine-actionable knowledge requires claims, contributions, versions and provenance to acquire structured representation. DOI-based identification of ORKG Papers pushes citability below the level of the conventional document while preserving scholarly accountability. The archive becomes granular without becoming unstable: versions can proliferate because provenance preserves their sequence. Machine actionability intensifies this shift. Islam distinguishes readability from interpretability and interpretability from actionability. A machine may parse structured content without understanding the type of entity it encounters; it may identify that type without knowing what operations are permitted. PID-level metadata therefore acts as a thin operational membrane around heterogeneous digital objects. Scale can then be processed without requiring every object to possess the same internal form. Interoperability is achieved not through homogenisation but through a shared layer of addressable distinctions.
Frugal continuity describes the capacity of a mobile practice to persist because its material requirements remain below the threshold at which logistics begin to dominate experience. It is not minimalism as style, nor scarcity elevated into virtue. It is an operational relation between what must be carried, what can be encountered locally, what can be repeatedly restored, and what must remain cognitively available for the field to continue. The distinction matters because mobility research often treats the observer’s support system as external to method. Yet every sustained sequence of walking, travelling, documenting and comparing depends on food, shelter, washing, communication, charging, transport and rest. When these are reduced to manageable routines, they cease to interrupt fieldwork and become its enabling substrate.
Movement produces knowledge when transitions remain permeable. Mobile-methods scholarship establishes that walking, following and travelling alter the research encounter itself: perception is reorganised through rhythm, distraction, bodily effort, orientation and the unforeseen. The methodological problem is therefore not how to remove contingency but how to preserve enough openness for contingency to become evidence. A fixed route can suppress the very phenomena that make movement analytically productive, while unlimited improvisation can dissolve comparability. Frugal continuity operates between these poles. It keeps the observer materially light enough to adapt while maintaining recurrent practices—notes, photographs, rest, nourishment, digital work, sleep—through which one episode remains commensurable with the next. Everyday infrastructure is the hidden architecture of this persistence. A café can function as workstation, observation point and temporal hinge; a supermarket converts carriage into local replenishment; a laundromat transforms a very small wardrobe into a long-duration system; a modest hotel restores the body; a regional train carries the field through settlements that a faster connection would erase. Guma’s mundane temporalities are particularly important here because they relocate infrastructure in repetition, repair, waiting, maintenance and ordinary use. Such episodes rarely appear as “findings”, yet they determine whether observation can continue with sufficient attentional quality. Infrastructure becomes epistemic when it alters the duration and continuity of exposure. Sufficiency gives this practical economy a conceptual precision that lifestyle minimalism lacks. To have “enough” is neither to maximise resources nor to minimise them absolutely. It is to maintain an adequate scale relative to a purpose. In mobility research, that means enough clothing to preserve bodily equilibrium, enough technology to document and work, enough connectivity to navigate and communicate, enough food and rest to sustain attention, but not so much equipment that transport, guarding, packing and accommodation become the dominant organisation of the journey. The same principle can be extended from the observer to mobility systems themselves: accessibility and wellbeing must be preserved while energy and material demand are constrained. Sufficiency is therefore a relational threshold, not an aesthetic preference. Prolonged comparative fieldwork makes this threshold visible because accumulation changes the observer. Earlier sites remain active in memory, novelty declines, categories stabilise and the speed of recognition increases. These gains are accompanied by risks: familiarity can become premature closure, bodily adaptation can conceal fatigue, and logistical fluency can make the enabling infrastructures disappear from analysis. Frugal continuity therefore requires periodic recalibration. The field remains open only when maintenance is treated as part of observation rather than as lost time. Eating, washing, waiting, resting and reorganising equipment are not interruptions to comparison; they are operations that preserve the capacity to compare. Socioplastics can use this principle at the level of corpus and archive. A field becomes durable when it retains enough traces to reconstruct relations without allowing documentary accumulation to overwhelm legibility. Frugal continuity therefore joins material mobility to archival economy: select, maintain, revisit, repair and recirculate. Its force lies in showing that epistemic abundance can emerge from material restraint. Many observations may be produced from few possessions; many comparisons from recurrent routines; many conceptual transitions from infrastructures that remain ordinary and almost invisible. What frugal continuity adds to Socioplastics is a theory of persistence in which knowledge grows not by carrying everything forward, but by maintaining the minimal conditions through which the field can continue to move.
Palmese, C., Carles Arribas, J.L. and Rodríguez Antolín, A. (2024) ‘The Soundscape and Listening as an Approach to Sensuous Urbanism: The Case of Puerta del Sol (Madrid)’, Urban Planning, 9, Article 7206. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.7206.
Palmese, Carles Arribas and Rodríguez Antolín formulate listening as a mode of urban knowledge. Working in Puerta del Sol, Madrid, they combine soundwalks, improvised interview mapping, sound archives, performances, questionnaires, acoustic measurements and collective sound actions to examine how citizens perceive and produce the sonic character of a major public space. Their central contribution is methodological: quantitative measurement and situated listening are not competing epistemologies but complementary ways of approaching an environment whose meaning changes with time, activity and social context. Participants repeatedly exceed predefined sound categories, showing that perception generates descriptions unavailable to closed taxonomies. The authors consequently argue for adaptable, place-specific methodologies capable of integrating the present and the absent, the measurable and the experiential. The work bridges urbanism, music, environmental psychology, geography and participatory research. Its strongest implication is that urban observation is itself mobile and embodied: the city becomes intelligible through practices of attentive movement that record not only what occupies space but how space is collectively heard.
Fraisse, V., Tarlao, C. and Guastavino, C. (2024) ‘Shaping city soundscapes: In situ comparison of four sound installations in an urban public space’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 251, 105173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105173.
Fraisse, Tarlao and Guastavino move soundscape research from diagnosis to intervention. Four temporary sound installations were deployed across two summers in the same public space and evaluated through 825 questionnaires, allowing the authors to compare how distinct compositions altered calmness, pleasantness, perceived loudness, restorativeness and attention to existing sound sources. The central proposition is that sound can be designed as an urban resource rather than addressed only through noise mitigation. Each installation produced common improvements while also generating composition-specific effects: abstract sounds tended to become more noticeable, whereas nature sounds supported stronger restorative responses. Crucially, the installations redirected attention away from other non-dominant sources, revealing acoustic design as an operation on perceptual hierarchy. The study bridges sound art, landscape architecture and evidence-based urban design by treating artistic intervention as experimentally assessable. Its wider significance lies in demonstrating that aesthetic practices can function as low-cost, site-specific urban instruments whose effects are measurable without stripping them of compositional specificity.
Chrobak, G., Aslanoğlu, R., Lubańska, A., Kowalczyk, T., Tokarczyk-Dorociak, K., Szewrański, S. and Kazak, J.K. (2024) ‘Graph Enhanced Co-Occurrence: Deep dive into urban park soundscape’, Ecological Indicators, 165, 112172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112172.
Chrobak et al. treat the soundscape of urban parks as a network rather than a list of acoustic events. Their methodological innovation is to use graph theory to map the co-occurrence and interconnectivity of natural and anthropogenic sounds observed through soundwalks in parks in Wrocław and Ankara. Centrality, connectivity and network position reveal how certain sounds—especially birds and water—operate as organising nodes within acoustic ecosystems and can mediate the perception of urban noise. This approach moves soundscape research beyond independent-source classification toward the study of relational acoustic organisation. The work’s iconic idea is that the experience of a park arises from an acoustic ecology whose elements acquire meaning through co-presence. Quantitative network analysis is therefore joined to qualitative sense-making. The wider intellectual bridge connects environmental acoustics to complexity science and landscape planning, demonstrating how graph methods can disclose sensory structure without reducing experience to decibel levels. Sound becomes a patterned urban system whose internal relations can inform spatial design.
Cao, J. and Kang, J. (2024) ‘Effect of human sound component on the sociability of urban public spaces—a case study in Sheffield, UK’, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1523. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03929-y.
Cao and Kang investigate sound not as environmental nuisance but as a constituent of social possibility. Using Peace Gardens in Sheffield, they construct four 360-degree soundscape conditions that vary the prominence and type of human sound, then evaluate them through soundscape-quality measures and willingness for social interaction. Affordance Theory provides the conceptual mechanism: acoustic conditions are assessed according to both their suitability for social activity and their capacity to stimulate interaction. The key result complicates the assumption that quieter space is automatically more sociable. Foreground human sound can increase both suitability and stimulation, whereas other conditions distribute these qualities unevenly. Demographic and companion-group differences further show that acoustic preference is socially situated. The study bridges environmental acoustics, environmental psychology and public-space design by making sociability measurable as an auditory affordance. Its broader contribution is to recast urban sound as relational infrastructure: conversations, voices and eventfulness actively configure how public space invites encounter rather than merely forming a background to visual urbanism.
Mansour, E.A., Elazab, E.M. and Sheta, S.A. (2026) ‘Reviewing frameworks for identifying the memory of the city in historical urban landscape’, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 41, pp. 691–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-025-10241-x.
Mansour, Elazab and Sheta address urban memory as an identifiable yet multidimensional component of historical urban landscapes. Their central proposition is that memory cannot be protected by cataloguing monuments alone because it emerges through relations between human experience and place. The review synthesises previous frameworks into two principal dimensions: the human, comprising psychological and social experience, and the place, comprising activities and physical characteristics. It then proposes a two-stage procedure combining desk-based analysis with in-field data collection and community engagement. This structure turns a diffuse cultural concept into an operational framework for regeneration. Temporal continuity, attachment, reminders, spatial organisation and social use become interdependent evidential layers. The paper bridges heritage conservation, environmental psychology and urban design by treating memory as a planning variable that is neither purely intangible nor reducible to fabric. Its wider significance lies in making regeneration accountable to what inhabitants remember, recognise and reproduce, thereby shifting heritage from object-centred preservation toward relational continuity.
Lister, P. (2024) ‘Creating a City for All of Us: The Possible Role of the Fediverse in Archiving Civic Urban Memory’, Digital Society, 3, 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-024-00137-8.
Lister relocates urban memory from proprietary social platforms into the institutional question of civic technological sovereignty. The paper proposes a citizen-generated urban memory archive hosted through the decentralised architecture of the Fediverse, with Mastodon serving as an indicative technical model. Its iconic idea is that collective digital memory should function as a civic public good: publicly owned, interoperable, citizen-curated and capable of surviving the closure or strategic decisions of private platforms. Methodologically, the paper combines literature on social memory, digital archives, learning cities and civic technology with a speculative infrastructural design. Questions of moderation, consent, anonymity and privacy are treated as constitutive archival decisions rather than peripheral governance problems. The wider contribution is to link memory studies to platform studies and public infrastructure. Urban remembrance becomes inseparable from protocols of ownership and persistence. The archive is therefore not simply a store of representations of the city; it is a civic institution whose technical architecture determines who may contribute, who governs continuity and under what conditions shared memory remains accessible.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)